Recently, the Bureau of Jinan City Huanwei recruited five students work Amoy fecal red jump up quickly in the network, that someone closed it as "a new era Chuanxiang", "Best 5 Amoy fecal group cattle." However, some netizens said that students work Amoy fecal reflected the depreciation of knowledge and talent, was chilling. (September 22, "Guangzhou Daily") Faced with such a news, I really do not know where to go what to say. Is China's college students must follow this way to realize their life? I feel no need even more is a great waste of educational resources and greatly reduce the value of their own. We know that workers dig dung is basically no technical content, a person of sound as long as the body can adapt to this kind of work, and an acceptance of higher education to do the job of such a thing, I think it is absurd and laughable. If this is the way of employment if the employment is also called China's higher education really is demeaning to the position of the gentle sweeping. And such a boast is only for their own educational policy education sector as a stall failure fills the so-called independent entrepreneurs is that reason. If students are to start their own businesses after graduation, then, China's many departments there is no meaning. Because there is no need to carry out the necessary employment of university students and can guide the students to say something like full employment, the employment rate reached 100%, that is how glamorous figure! In fact the logic is not the case. Why dig dung was fighting for workers with work or go to illustrate the severe employment situation, and this severe deformity of the education industry is the result of a deformed chicken eggs, the next, because the chicken was not looking to transform itself to find the egg it. Doing so, it seems from the source is a mistake. The absurd thing is that, from the Peking University students began to sell pork, he was applauded all the way to the media, do they have bought pork, do not they dig through shit, how does this with such a sense of identity? I am very different. We take a look at the famous original response on this matter Zhu is very dramatic. Face interview, he said, students dig manure in just reflected in the significance of the work "may change the status quo of China's dig dung" because, whether in thought, or dig dung on the use of tools, students have an edge, which will "the Chinese away from the traditional sense of the dig dung." What kind of logic that, in the eyes of the teacher Zhu, dig dung is not a simple sense of manual labor, but rather it is a high-tech industries. The need for new thinking, new tools, more significant is that "change the status of dig dung" it? And when more people into this industry, when both run out of those positions should have in the people who work on their own, and those who go out? They must be unemployed, so, in the country, within the scope of such a low level of employment statistics in fact, should not be within the employment rate. Zhu Jun, the teacher may also have their own feelings on this bar, and feelings come from? Personal experience? Does not seem to? And about the time his form of value, not a way can be achieved. Because of the high number of face for their own tuition fees, how can such work make up for their losses? How many light years to make up for what course? So now when someone advocating such a way so that when the employment of university students to cover up the underlying abnormalities caused by the industrialization of higher education policy and human resources and social security departments of the omission.

Previous: Focus on the Family Education and Family Education Zhou Gaofeng Forum Held in
Next： Senior Family Education experts teach you to become better parents